XYZ BIMCollective · Portugal Research
xyzbim.eu / pesquisa · índice

Research: studies, radars and tools

What the atelier investigates and publishes: documentary studies on primary sources, radars of the free scientific literature and calculation tools that run in the browser. Every page declares its sources, its method and its verification date in the footer; the index below groups them by type.

radarsOpen access literature radars

Counts over the free scientific literature (OpenAlex): what gets published, on which topics, at what pace, with every paper linked to its full text. Topic classification is automatic, by a dictionary of expressions over title, abstract and keywords: it measures trends and does not replace a systematic review.

studiesStudies and dossiers

Documentary work on primary sources: legislation, official reports, standards, databases and competition briefs read in full. Every claim cites document and page; the verification date is in the footer of each study.

09 · fees

Public design fees

A documentary archaeology from 1940 to 2026: from the state fee rule (RCHAP/ICHPOP) to the European prohibition of fee tables, down to the OA reports that measure design awarded at 2.54% of the works value.

1940–20262.54% awarded 2023–255 official documents
open ↗
08 · public competitions

Meta-concurso · the perfect tender documents and the perfect response

The perfect tender documents and the perfect response, distilled from 705 architecture competitions (2010–2026) and 1,059 documents read in full — price measured where it is a criterion and where it is not, the most tested jury scheme, and the formal exclusions that cost proposals.

705 competitions1,059 documents89.4% with price in the criteria
open ↗
10 · public requirement

Public BIM in infrastructure — a European comparison

How six public clients — Germany, Spain, the Basque Country, Norway, Sweden and the Netherlands — turn BIM into a procurement requirement. Three generations of maturity, from text in the tender documents to the machine-readable requirement.

3,439 LOIN (DE)1,232 BIM tenders (ES, 2024)6 jurisdictions
open ↗
04 · public policy

PortugalBIM scorecard

The national BIM strategy (RCM 89/2026) graded against the eight macro maturity components of Succar & Kassem, on the BIMMI scale. Facts verified against the public sources, with the trigger that would raise each grade.

8 componentsaverage grade bverified 1 September 2026
open ↗
15 · building regulation

The digital building logbook — the European directive, the BIM mandate and where the value appears

Directive (EU) 2024/1275 (EPBD) defines it — but does not make it mandatory ("caso exista", "should it exist"). It is Portugal's 2030 BIM mandate that will populate it by law. The economics of the Commission study, the French, Flemish and Estonian models, and the map of who awards the most works in Portugal, built on the open data of the Portal BASE.

5 points in the directiveBIM mandatory 2030verified 5 September 2026
open ↗
22 · construction law

RJUE, article by article

From the Constitution to the municipal regulation: the 13 branches that govern what gets built in Portugal, as a linear tree, with the status of each legal instrument confirmed in the Diário da República — and an interactive timeline: drag the slider from 1951 to 2026 and the tree reacts, including what changes on 1 October with the new RJUE. With an unprecedented cross-check: which regulation is cited by each unit of works.

51 nodes · 13 branchestimeline 1951–2026verified 11 September 2026
open ↗
16 · digital permitting

Anatomy of a case in e-ehitus (Estonia)

What a permitting case is when it is, seriously, digital: in Estonia, every document belongs to a numbered procedure with a published authority, manager, status and duration — hanging off a public building down to the geometry. And a tour of the world with real samples of each dataset, checked against the requirements of the EPBD logbook: every country has opened one layer — nobody has yet the complete logbook the law asks for.

13 public columns6 countries comparedverified 4 September 2026
open ↗
05 · product regulation

Digital Product Passport — the complete dossier + all the papers

ESPR (EU) 2024/1781 and the family of laws around it: chronology to 2030, the EN standards of JTC 24, the EU registry already operational — and the 893 papers published on the topic, filterable.

893 papers8 EN standardsverified 2 September 2026
open ↗
07 · comparative study

Embodied carbon — the same material is worth 2× depending on the database

ICE × KBOB × ÖKOBAUDAT (the three free databases), side by side, per kg, modules A1–A3: the same manufacturing route converges (−6% on EAF steel); different routes diverge 2.4× within the same database. Methodology, assumptions and replicable scripts.

3 databases · 6+2 pairsEAF steel −6%10 references
open ↗
13 · housing policy

Rent control, as the evidence sees it

A group debate on rents, empty homes and taxes on land, turned into a literature review: 1,641 papers collected, 33 studies extracted, cases from four continents — every claim with its source. Rent control, upzoning, vouchers, land value tax and Vienna, with the final question: can rents come down without destroying the market?

1,641 papers20 case studies7 debate questions
open ↗
17 · cooperative housing

How much does a cooperative home really cost? MOME vs. the market and vs. the international literature

The "20% below market" promise of the MOME cooperatives (Gaia and Porto), measured for the first time against real listings — and set beside what the studies from other countries measure: Vienna −25%, Zurich −36%, Barcelona −45%, Uruguay −38%, US −51%. Where the discount is large, it is the land, the profit and the scale that get cut — not only the tag.

7 countries20% promised · 0–25% measuredverified 5 September 2026
open ↗
18 · AI visibility

AI visibility panel in construction

Eleven sources that the answer engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot) read for construction questions in Portugal, audited on five retrieval signals: Common Crawl, llms.txt, robots.txt, sitemap and structured data. Round 0: ten of the eleven are in the corpus — and the only one missing has the best-kept door of them all.

11 domains10 fixed questionsround 0 · 5 September 2026
open ↗

toolsTools

Local calculation in the browser, no server and no upload, over public tables and rules reproduced with the source in sight.

essaysEssays and verified lists

Argued positions and curated lists, with the evidence linked.

11 · essay

The problems of LOD — and why procurement uses LOIN

The 100–500 scale is a good common language and a bad contract clause: one number per element does not say for what use, is not validated by machine and has no place for documentation. What EN 17412-1 puts in its place — and the Portuguese advantage of arriving late.

3 components (G·A·D)1,301 works · all classified0/1,059 tender documents cite LOD
open ↗
12 · international competitions

Ideas competitions — free entry only

International architecture competitions open with a €0 entry, each one confirmed on its official page — ideas, real works and exhibitions, filterable by deadline, type and audience. The platforms that live on entry fees stay out, with the fees measured and the source in sight.

6 open competitions€0 feeverified 3 September 2026
open ↗
19 · essay

Millimetre accuracy — what the studies actually measure

Marketing promises millimetre laser surveys; the studies that validate point clouds and BIM models against independent measurements find centimetres — and the standards themselves (USIBD LOA) specify in bands of 15–50 mm. Where the millimetre is real, where it is nothing but a datasheet, and what to demand in tender documents instead of the word millimetric.

8 studies read in full22–68 mm · average BIM modelling errorLOA20 = 15–50 mm
open ↗
20 · essay

The Boeing 777 of construction — why it does not yet exist

How aerospace, the car industry, semiconductors, logistics and cinema integrated their chains — open standard, someone with the contractual power to impose it, a product that repeats — and the test construction fails: no building in the world has its process documented and its as-built model publicly accessible. The closest cases, why FM models stay closed (it is not the vendors), and what can be mirrored without turning the site into a factory.

0 buildings with an open as-built−1%/year · US productivity 1970–2020~1,700 works reviewed
open ↗